Difference between revisions of "Complaints against Security Guards (5:VI)"

Complaints against Security Guards (5:VI) (view source)

8 bytes removed , 01:40, 19 May 2016

m

5,483

edits

Revision as of 23:08, 17 May 2016 (view source) Desy Wahyuni (talk \| contribs) ← Older edit		Revision as of 01:40, 19 May 2016 (view source) Desy Wahyuni (talk \| contribs) m (→‎B. Filing the Complaint) Newer edit →
Line 20:		Line 20:
	'''NOTE:''' Pivot Legal Society claims this case is an example of why social condition should be included as an enumerated ground. Please see the Pivot Legal blog for further information: http://pivotlegal.org/pivot-points/blog/tribunal-member-qualifies-downtown-ambassadors-decision.		'''NOTE:''' Pivot Legal Society claims this case is an example of why social condition should be included as an enumerated ground. Please see the Pivot Legal blog for further information: http://pivotlegal.org/pivot-points/blog/tribunal-member-qualifies-downtown-ambassadors-decision.

	NOTE: Clients should be cautioned that this complaint process may not achieve satisfactory results. The Security Programs Division is limited in its ability to successfully review the conduct of security guards, both because of statutory limitations to its powers and budget constraints.		'''NOTE:''' Clients should be cautioned that this complaint process may not achieve satisfactory results. The Security Programs Division is limited in its ability to successfully review the conduct of security guards, both because of statutory limitations to its powers and budget constraints.