Anonymous

Difference between revisions of "Resolving Criminal Matters Prior to Trial (1:VI)"

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
m
Line 25: Line 25:
In order for a peace bond to be imposed, there must exist '''reasonable grounds''' for the complainant to believe that the accused will cause personal injury to the complainant or his or her spouse or child or that they will cause damage to his or her property at the time of the peace bond proceedings. Therefore, in entering into a peace bond voluntarily, the client is conceding that the complainant has reasonable grounds for their fear. The accused does not have to admit to all of the facts in the Report to Crown Counsel. However, they do have to admit to sufficient facts to form a reasonable basis for the victim to fear the accused. If there are facts that are in dispute, discuss this with Crown first. If both sides come to an agreement, the court process is similar to a sentencing hearing in terms of the submissions that are made. For more information, see the section on [[{{PAGENAME}}#D. Pleading Guilty | Pleading Guilty]], below.
In order for a peace bond to be imposed, there must exist '''reasonable grounds''' for the complainant to believe that the accused will cause personal injury to the complainant or his or her spouse or child or that they will cause damage to his or her property at the time of the peace bond proceedings. Therefore, in entering into a peace bond voluntarily, the client is conceding that the complainant has reasonable grounds for their fear. The accused does not have to admit to all of the facts in the Report to Crown Counsel. However, they do have to admit to sufficient facts to form a reasonable basis for the victim to fear the accused. If there are facts that are in dispute, discuss this with Crown first. If both sides come to an agreement, the court process is similar to a sentencing hearing in terms of the submissions that are made. For more information, see the section on [[{{PAGENAME}}#D. Pleading Guilty | Pleading Guilty]], below.


Occasionally, such as when the Crown wishes to impose a peace bond and the accused does not agree, there will be a full hearing on the issue. The Crown often considers peace bonds in cases of spousal assault  because  of  a  victim's  reluctance  to  go  to  trial.  At  the  hearing,  the  Crown  must  prove  on  a '''balance of probabilities''' that there are reasonable grounds for the fear. '''Hearsay evidence is allowed, as it goes to the informant’s belief that there are grounds for the fear''' (''R. v PAO'', [2002] BCJ No 3021 (BC Prov Ct)). Since there is no criminal standard of proof, the judge must look at ''all'' the evidence, and not focus merely on the absence of the offending conduct (''R  v Dol'', [2004] BCJ No 2314 (BCSC)).  
Occasionally, such as when the Crown wishes to impose a peace bond and the accused does not agree, there will be a full hearing on the issue. The Crown often considers peace bonds in cases of spousal assault  because  of  a  victim's  reluctance  to  go  to  trial.  At  the  hearing,  the  Crown  must  prove  on  a '''balance of probabilities''' that there are reasonable grounds for the fear. '''Hearsay evidence is allowed, as it goes to the informant’s belief that there are grounds for the fear''' (''R. v PAO'', [2002] BCJ No 3021 (BC Prov Ct)). Since there is no criminal standard of proof, the judge must look at '''all''' the evidence, and not focus merely on the absence of the offending conduct (''R  v Dol'', [2004] BCJ No 2314 (BCSC)).  


If a person breaches the peace bond, a criminal charge may be laid against the bonded person. Peace bonds are sometimes used  as alternatives  to criminal charges like uttering  threats  (s 264.1), criminal harassment (s 264), and minor assaults (s 266). The benefit to the client is that formal criminal charges are dropped. The benefit to the complainant is that the no-contact condition of a peace bond addresses his or her concerns without raising the uncertainty and possible trauma of a trial. A client should be advised that while a peace bond is not a criminal record, it may affect future hearings, travel outside the country, and decisions concerning custody.
If a person breaches the peace bond, a criminal charge may be laid against the bonded person. Peace bonds are sometimes used  as alternatives  to criminal charges like uttering  threats  (s 264.1), criminal harassment (s 264), and minor assaults (s 266). The benefit to the client is that formal criminal charges are dropped. The benefit to the complainant is that the no-contact condition of a peace bond addresses his or her concerns without raising the uncertainty and possible trauma of a trial. A client should be advised that while a peace bond is not a criminal record, it may affect future hearings, travel outside the country, and decisions concerning custody.