Anonymous

Difference between revisions of "Contracts for Sale of Goods (11:III)"

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
Line 248: Line 248:
The buyer’s primary right for a breach of a condition is to repudiate the contract and reject the goods. This can normally be exercised regardless of the actual quantum of loss or benefit to the parties. However, the right to repudiate may be lost under the ''SGA''.
The buyer’s primary right for a breach of a condition is to repudiate the contract and reject the goods. This can normally be exercised regardless of the actual quantum of loss or benefit to the parties. However, the right to repudiate may be lost under the ''SGA''.


In the case of a rightful repudiation, the buyer may refuse further payment, and in addition, seek either damages or restitution from the  seller. The consequence of wrongful repudiation termination (the buyer repudiates when he or she did not have the right to do so; e.g. because the seller breached a warranty rather than a condition) is that the buyer is liable to the seller for his or her own breach of condition. So, it is important to determine whether or not repudiation is justified '''before''' taking any action, by determining the nature of the term the seller breached.  
In the case of a rightful repudiation, the buyer may refuse further payment, and in addition, seek either damages or restitution from the  seller. The consequence of wrongful repudiation termination (the buyer repudiates when they did not have the right to do so; e.g. because the seller breached a warranty rather than a condition) is that the buyer is liable to the seller for their own breach of condition. So, it is important to determine whether or not repudiation is justified '''before''' taking any action, by determining the nature of the term the seller breached.  


===== (1) When a Breach of Condition is Treated as a Breach of Warranty =====
===== (1) When a Breach of Condition is Treated as a Breach of Warranty =====
Line 266: Line 266:
Under s 38, if the buyer has not previously examined the goods, there is no acceptance unless and until the buyer has had a reasonable opportunity to examine them. However, under s 39 a purchaser has accepted the goods once (1) the seller is notified by the buyer of  acceptance, (2) the goods are used in a manner inconsistent with the seller’s ownership (e.g. reselling the goods to a third party), or (3) the goods are retained without being rejected within a “reasonable time”.  
Under s 38, if the buyer has not previously examined the goods, there is no acceptance unless and until the buyer has had a reasonable opportunity to examine them. However, under s 39 a purchaser has accepted the goods once (1) the seller is notified by the buyer of  acceptance, (2) the goods are used in a manner inconsistent with the seller’s ownership (e.g. reselling the goods to a third party), or (3) the goods are retained without being rejected within a “reasonable time”.  


The court determines a reasonable time for inspection and possible rejection by looking at all the circumstances surrounding the transaction.  
The court determines a reasonable time for inspection and possible rejection by looking at all the circumstances surrounding the transaction.


==== b) Damages for Breach of Condition ====
==== b) Damages for Breach of Condition ====
5,109

edits