Anonymous

Difference between revisions of "Alternatives to Divorce (3:VII)"

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= September 29, 2020}}
{{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= August 12, 2021}}
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = family}}
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = family}}


Line 5: Line 5:


An annulment differs conceptually from a divorce because a divorce terminates a legal status, whereas an annulment is a declaration that the parties’ marital status never properly existed. A declaration of nullity may be obtained for two types of marriages:  
An annulment differs conceptually from a divorce because a divorce terminates a legal status, whereas an annulment is a declaration that the parties’ marital status never properly existed. A declaration of nullity may be obtained for two types of marriages:  
*void marriages, which are null and void ''ab initio'' (from the outset); and  
*Void marriages, which are null and void ''ab initio'' (from the outset); and  
*voidable marriages, which are valid until a court of competent jurisdiction grants a declaration of nullity (although such a declaration has the effect of invalidating the marriage from its beginning).  
*Voidable marriages, which are valid until a court of competent jurisdiction grants a declaration of nullity (although such a declaration has the effect of invalidating the marriage from its beginning).  


The difference between a void and voidable marriage is less important in matrimonial proceedings in British Columbia than it was when the ''FRA'' was in effect (see s 95(2) and part 5). The ''FLA'' ss 21-22 also do not make any distinction. For purposes other than the ''FLA'', the distinction may still be relevant.   
The difference between a void and voidable marriage is less important in matrimonial proceedings in British Columbia than it was when the ''FRA'' was in effect (see s 95(2) and part 5). The ''FLA'' ss 21-22 also do not make any distinction. For purposes other than the ''FLA'', the distinction may still be relevant.   


A marriage is void ''ab initio'' if:  
A marriage is void ''ab initio'' if:  
*either of the parties was, at the time of the marriage, still married to another party;  
*Either of the parties was, at the time of the marriage, still married to another party;  
*one of the parties did not consent to the marriage;
*One of the parties did not consent to the marriage;
*the parties are related within the bonds of consanguinity (descent from a common ancestor); or  
*The parties are related within the bonds of consanguinity (descent from a common ancestor); or  
*the formal requirements imposed by provincial statute (such as the ''BC Marriage Act'') are not fulfilled.  
*The formal requirements imposed by provincial statute (such as the ''BC Marriage Act'') are not fulfilled.  


Misrepresentation is a ground for annulment only where the misrepresentation leads to a mistake about the identity of the other party or as to the nature of the marriage ceremony.  
Misrepresentation is a ground for annulment only where the misrepresentation leads to a mistake about the identity of the other party or as to the nature of the marriage ceremony.  


A voidable marriage is valid until one of the parties to it obtains a declaration of nullity. The declaration must be obtained during the parties’ joint lives, and is not available if the parties are already divorced. In Canada, a marriage may be voidable in the following circumstances:  
A voidable marriage is valid until one of the parties to it obtains a declaration of nullity. The declaration must be obtained during the parties’ joint lives, and is not available if the parties are already divorced. In Canada, a marriage may be voidable in the following circumstances:  
*either party is impotent or otherwise unable to consummate the marriage (as opposed to unwilling to consummate the marriage, which may constitute cruelty but does not render the marriage voidable (see [http://canlii.ca/t/54b4 ''Juretic v Ruiz'', 1999 BCCA 417]); or  
*Either party is impotent or otherwise unable to consummate the marriage (as opposed to unwilling to consummate the marriage, which may constitute cruelty but does not render the marriage voidable (see [http://canlii.ca/t/54b4 ''Juretic v Ruiz'', 1999 BCCA 417]); or  
*a party is under 14 years of age.  
*A party is under 14 years of age.  


These are common law rules.  
These are common law rules.  
5,109

edits