When You Can Still Sue (12:VII)

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
Revision as of 19:23, 13 October 2025 by LSLAP (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This information applies to British Columbia, Canada. Last reviewed for legal accuracy by the Law Students' Legal Advice Program on 1 August 2025.



This section applies to all claims for accidents that occurred on or after May 1, 2021.

A. Injuries from an Accident

There is no longer a right of action (an ability to bring a lawsuit against someone) in British Columbia for injuries from a motor vehicle accident (IVA, s 115).

However, s 116(2) of the IVA outlines certain exceptions in which those injured in a motor vehicle accident can sue for certain non-pecuniary and non-compensatory damages (non-pecuniary damages are those that are difficult to assign a number value to, such as pain and suffering damages. Non-compensatory damages are those that are not meant to directly compensate for the injury, such as punitive damages, which are designed to punish the defendant). The exceptions are:

(a) A vehicle manufacturer, respecting its business activities and role as a manufacturer;
(b) A person who is in the business of selling vehicles, respecting the person's business activities and role as a seller;
(c) A maker or supplier of vehicle parts, respecting its business activities and role as a maker or supplier;
(d) A garage service operator, respecting its business activities and role as a garage service operator;
(e) A licensee within the meaning of the Liquor Control and Licensing Act whose licence authorizes a patron to consume liquor in the service area under the licence, respecting the licensee's role as a licensee in the sale or service of liquor to a patron;
(f) A person whose use or operation of a vehicle
(i) Caused bodily injury, and
(ii) Results in the person's conviction of a prescribed Criminal Code offence; [(s 12 of the IVR sets out prescribed Criminal Code offences)]
(g) A person in a prescribed class of persons. [(s 13 of the IVR further defines this)].

Note that the government has reserved the right to pass new regulations restricting s 116(a) - 116(e). They also reserve the right to pass further regulations clarifying exceptions under s 116 (g).

These exceptions also do not apply to voluntary operators and passengers in vehicles that, “knew or ought to have known...[were] being operated without the consent of the owner, the out-of-province owner or, in the case of a leased motor vehicle, the lessee” (IVA, s 116(1)). This means that voluntary operators and passengers in situations where a vehicle is being operated without the owner or lessee’s consent cannot sue under the new system, even if they otherwise fit within the other exceptions outlined in s 116(2).

B. Vehicle Damage

There is no longer a right of action (an ability to bring a lawsuit against someone) in British Columbia in most circumstances for vehicle damage occurring in accidents involving at least two cars and occurring on- and off-highway (IVA, s 172, 173).

However, there are certain prescribed classes of persons who may still have an action brought against them for vehicle damage from on-highway accidents, or who may start an action for vehicle damage from off-highway accidents (IVA, s 172 and 173). See the Basic Vehicle Damage Coverage Regulation s 6(2) and 8(2) for these exceptions.

C. Uninsured and Unidentified Motorist Cases

As noted in Part I, Sections III.D and E of this manual, in order to claim damages in uninsured and unidentified motorist cases, a claimant may be required to bring legal action against an uninsured motorist, or (in unidentified motorist cases) against ICBC as a nominal defendant. As noted, the coverage for uninsured and unidentified motorist accidents only applies to non-vehicle property damage caused by such accidents, so the bars on litigation for injuries and vehicle damage discussed above would not affect the ability to litigate in these cases.


© Copyright 2025, The Greater Vancouver Law Students' Legal Advice Society.