Dispute Resolution in Residential Tenancies (19:XII): Difference between revisions

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 103: Line 103:
== C. Enforcing the Arbitrators Order ==
== C. Enforcing the Arbitrators Order ==


NOTE:               If  a  successful  party  has  any concerns  about  the  ability  to  serve  an  order,  he  or  she  should request  an  order  under  RTA,  s  71(1)  permitting  alternate  means  of  service.  An  example  of such an order would be one that permits serving a document at a tenant’ s workplace rather than at their new home. 1.Enforcing a Monetary Order   The Arbitrator may order the tenant or landlord to pay a monetary amount or to bear all or part  of  the  costs  of dispute  resolution  (RTA,  s  67). Enforcement  of  the  order  is  the  sole responsibility of the applicant. If the monetary order is in favour of a tenant still living in the rental unit owned by the landlord that the order is against, the  Arbitrator may direct the tenant  to  deduct  the  award  from  the  rent  (RTA,  s  65(1)(b)).  Rent  should  not  be  withheld unless  the  decision  explicitly  states  this  is  allowed.  If  the  monetary  order  is  in  favour  of  a landlord  still  holding  part  or  all  of  the  security  deposit  paid  by  the  tenant,  it  may  be deducted from the tenant’ s security deposit. If neither of these situations applies, one should give the other party a written request for payment stating the amount owing and requesting payment by the date on the order or within a reasonable time. If the other party still does not pay, the order can be filed in the Small Claims Court.  2.Enforcing a Repair Order If  a  landlord  fails  to  make  repairs  as  ordered  by  an  Arbitrator, the  tenant  can  apply  for  an order  requiring  compliance.  The  order  to  comply  may  include  an  order  that  the  landlord reduces the rent until the repairs are complete.  3.Enforcing an Order of Possession The  purpose  of an Order  of Possession is  to  gain  vacant  possession  of  the  rental  premises. The landlord should first give a copy of the Order of Possession to each person named in the  order.  The  best  way  to do  this is  to  hand  the copy  to  the other  parties  personally  or  by registered  mail.  The  RTA  also  permits  for  the  Order  of  Possession  to  be  posted  on  the tenant’ s door.  The  tenant  should  be  asked  to  move  out  of  the rental  unit  within  the  time period given in the order. If a tenant does not comply with the order, the landlord must notattempt to physically remove the tenant by his or her own means (RTA, s 57(1)(2)), as this is unlawful. Bailiff services, described below, can be used to lawfully remove the tenant. a)Use of Bailiff Services In  the  event  that  the  tenant  does  not  comply  with  the  order  and  does  not  vacate the  rental  unit  on  the  date  specified  on  the  order,  the  Order of Possession  can  be filed  in  the  Supreme  Court  of  B.C.  Registry.  The  landlord  must  fill  out  a  Writ  of Possession  and  an  Affidavit  (re:  service)  and  take  these completed forms  with  the Order  of  Possession  to  the  Supreme  Court. Once  the  documents  are  filed  and stamped in the Supreme Court, the landlord may contact a court bailiff service. The Writ of Possession is then ready to be executed by the court bailiff. Under  s 9  of  the Sheriff Act, RSBC 1996,  c.  425,  the  landlord is  required  to give  a deposit  to  the  court  bailiff  against  the  costs  of  the execution  of  the  writ.  This deposit  varies  depending  on  the  size  of  the  rental  unit.  For  example, $1,100  for a one-bedroom and $3,000 for a five-bedroom house will be required as a deposit for executing a seizure.
'''NOTE:''' If  a  successful  party  has  any concerns  about  the  ability  to  serve  an  order,  he  or  she  should request  an  order  under  RTA,  s  71(1)  permitting  alternate  means  of  service.  An  example  of such an order would be one that permits serving a document at a tenant’ s workplace rather than at their new home.  
 
=== 1. Enforcing a Monetary Order ===
 
The Arbitrator may order the tenant or landlord to pay a monetary amount or to bear all or part  of  the  costs  of dispute  resolution  (RTA,  s  67). '''Enforcement  of  the  order  is  the  sole responsibility of the applicant.''' If the monetary order is in favour of a '''tenant''' still living in the rental unit owned by the landlord that the order is against, the  Arbitrator may direct the tenant  to  deduct  the  award  from  the  rent  (RTA,  s  65(1)(b)).  Rent  should  not  be  withheld unless  the  decision  explicitly  states  this  is  allowed.  If  the  monetary  order  is  in  favour  of  a '''landlord''' still  holding  part  or  all  of  the  security  deposit  paid  by  the  tenant,  it  may  be deducted from the tenant’ s security deposit. If neither of these situations applies, one should give the other party a written request for payment stating the amount owing and requesting payment by the date on the order or within a reasonable time.  
 
If the other party still does not pay, the order can be filed in the Small Claims Court.   
 
=== 2. Enforcing a Repair Order ===
 
If  a  landlord  fails  to  make  repairs  as  ordered  by  an  Arbitrator, the  tenant  can  apply  for  an order  requiring  compliance.  The  order  to  comply  may  include  an  order  that  the  landlord reduces the rent until the repairs are complete.   
 
=== 3. Enforcing an Order of Possession ===
 
The  purpose  of an Order  of Possession is  to  gain  vacant  possession  of  the  rental  premises. The landlord should first give a copy of the Order of Possession to '''each person''' named in the  order.  The  best  way  to do  this is  to  hand  the copy  to  the other  parties  personally  or  by registered  mail.  The  RTA  also  permits  for  the  Order  of  Possession  to  be  posted  on  the tenant’s door.  The  tenant  should  be  asked  to  move  out  of  the rental  unit  within  the  time period given in the order. If a tenant does not comply with the order, the landlord must notattempt to physically remove the tenant by his or her own means (RTA, s 57(1)(2)), as this is unlawful. Bailiff services, described below, can be used to lawfully remove the tenant.  
 
==== a) Use of Bailiff Services ====
 
In  the  event  that  the  tenant  does  not  comply  with  the  order  and  does  not  vacate the  rental  unit  on  the  date  specified  on  the  order,  the  Order of Possession  can  be filed  in  the  Supreme  Court  of  B.C.  Registry.  The  landlord  must  fill  out  a  Writ  of Possession  and  an  Affidavit  (re:  service)  and  take  these completed forms  with  the Order  of  Possession  to  the  Supreme  Court. Once  the  documents  are  filed  and stamped in the Supreme Court, the landlord may contact a court bailiff service. The Writ of Possession is then ready to be executed by the court bailiff.  
 
Under  s 9  of  the ''Sheriff Act'', RSBC 1996,  c.  425,  the  landlord is  required  to give  a deposit  to  the  court  bailiff  against  the  costs  of  the execution  of  the  writ.  This deposit  varies  depending  on  the  size  of  the  rental  unit.  For  example, $1,100  for a one-bedroom and $3,000 for a five-bedroom house will be required as a deposit for executing a seizure.

Revision as of 05:57, 3 July 2016



A. General

The formal dispute resolution process may be avoided if an Information Officer is willing to phone one of the parties in order to explain the law, resulting in the dispute being resolved without the parties having to go through the dispute resolution process. For example, an Information Officer might call a landlord and tell him or her that landlords are required by law to provide rent receipts if the tenant pays rent in cash. The Information Officer will not take on the role of an Arbitrator and will only explain the Legislation.

Dispute resolution is the formal method of resolving disputes between landlords and tenants. Any party going to dispute resolution may be represented by an agent (e.g. a law student), barrister, or solicitor, and should advise the RTB of this before the hearing. The Arbitrator may exclude an agent if proper notification was not provided. To understand the procedure, advocates should read the dispute resolution Rules of Procedure that are available on the Residential Tenancy Branch web site.

1. Disputes Covered by Dispute Resolution

Virtually all claims that may arise between tenants and landlords are eligible for dispute resolution (see RTA, s 58). A court does not have and must not exercise any jurisdiction in respect of a matter that must be submitted to dispute resolution under the RTA. The exceptions are as follows:

  • the application was not filed within the application period specified under the RTA;
  • the dispute is linked substantially to a matter that is before the Supreme Court; or
  • the monetary claim exceeds the monetary limit prescribed in the Small Claims Act, RSBC 1996, c. 430, s 3. (Currently the monetary limit is $25,000.)

2. Arbitrator

Arbitrators are like judges and base their decisions on evidence and arguments presented by the parties at the dispute resolution hearing. The Arbitrator is not bound by other Arbitrator’s decisions but is bound by legal precedent established by the court. The Arbitrator makes the decision based on the merits of the case. An Arbitrator has authority to arbitrate disputes referred by the director to the Arbitrator, and any matters related to disputes that arise under the RTA or a tenancy agreement. Arbitrators may assist the parties, or offer the parties an opportunity to settle their dispute. They can record agreements reached by the parties, sign off on the agreement, and record the settlement order. Except as otherwise provided by the RTA, a decision of the director is final and binding (s 77(3)).

B. Dispute Resolution Procedure

1. Applying for Dispute Resolution

A landlord or tenant who wants a government-appointed Arbitrator to settle a dispute must complete an Application for Dispute Resolution form. The form is available at an RTB office or a Service BC office or online at the RTB website. Note that there are separate forms for the landlord and the tenant. An applicant who is a tenant would fill in and include:

  • his or her legal name and current address;
  • the address and legal name of the owner of the property (the landlord);
  • the rental unit noted in the tenancy agreement;
  • the relevant code of the RTA that deals with the problem (these are provided on the back of the dispute resolution form);
  • the part of the form that says “Details of the Dispute”. It is better to write down too much than too little, since insufficient information could be grounds for the respondent to request an adjournment; however, save specific details for the hearing;
  • that he or she wants the landlord to pay back the $50 filing fee; and
  • copies of the background material being provided as evidence for the case.

NOTE:

  • Rule 3 of the RTB Rules of Procedure (Ministry of Housing, 2005; available at http://bit.ly/1Igbqmg sets out how to serve the Application for Dispute Resolution, and how to submit and exchange documents. the time limits within which the parties and the Arbitrator must receive the documents to be used as evidence at the hearing. For applicants, the easiest way to comply with this rule is to attach all relevant documents to the initial application form. Evidence can be faxed to the RTB at 1-866-341-1269. (Applications cannot be submitted via fax).
  • Rule 3.14 governs evidence not submitted with the Application, and sets out that such evidence must be received by the other party and the Branch not less than 14 days before the hearing. In calculating the 14 days, the first and last day must be excluded. If the due date for service to the Branch falls on a day the office is closed, the limit is extended to the next day the office is open. If the date for service to the other party falls on a holiday, the limit is extended to the next non-holiday day. If evidence is not available within the deadline for service, under Rule 3.17 the Arbitrator has the discretion to determine whether or not to accept it.
  • You should also take special notice of the rules regarding how days of service are calculated. Documents sent by mail are deemed “received” five days later, while documents dropped through a mail slot or taped to a door are deemed “received” three days later. Please note that the RTB does not copy evidence for parties. See the Rules for further information.

An Information Officer at the RTB must check the form. This is best done in person. Clients who cannot go to an RTB office can file applications at a local Service BC office. Online applications require a credit card payment, so parties applying to waive the filing fee cannot use this method. The Richards Street and Downtown Eastside offices only accept applications where a fee waiver applies. Those offices do not handle money payments. The application will not be accepted until the applicant has paid $50 (by cash, or money order or certified cheque payable to the Minister of Finance). Any corrections or clarifications will need to be completed as well. People on income assistance or whose incomes fall below the low-income guidelines can apply to have the fee waived if they provide proof of their income status. The applicant is usually informed of the date of the hearing within 24 hours. The RTB created a Monetary Order Worksheet which must be completed when applying for a monetary order. The worksheet number is available online at: http://bit.ly/1ToyRm9.

The limitation period for designation of an Arbitrator (i.e. for filing the claim at the RTB) is two years from the end of the tenancy to which the dispute relates (RTA, s 60).

2. Direct Request

A landlord may make a Direct Request for an order of possession when he or she has issued a 10 day notice to end tenancy for non-payment of rent, and the tenant has neither paid the rent nor contested the notice. An order can then be granted without the need for a participatory hearing. The Direct Request process may be expanded, in the future, to cover other circumstances where a landlord serves a notice to end tenancy. Check on the RTB website for updates. Because of the Direct Request process it is very important that tenants never ignore a notice to end tenancy.

NOTE: It is possible that a tenant will receive a Notice of Direct Request in circumstances where they should receive a hearing (e.g. all arrears paid in 5 days, application for dispute resolution filed, legitimate dispute on merits). In such a case, it is imperative that the tenant immediately write to the RTB and request a dispute resolution hearing. The tenant should explain why their case is not appropriately addressed through the direct request process.

3. The Dispute Resolution Hearing

Hearings are a formal process, though less formal than court. The RTB uses the dispute resolution Rules of Procedure, which are online at http://bit.ly/1Igbqmg. The Information Officer may assist landlords and tenants by providing information about the procedure for resolving disputes, but will not help complete forms. An Arbitrator may make any finding of fact or law that is necessary or incidental to making a decision or an order under the RTA. The Arbitrator makes decisions based on the merits of the case and is not bound by previous Arbitrator decisions but is bound by court decisions. The Arbitrator considers all of the evidence and makes a decision based on the RTA, the common law, and the facts. The hearings are generally informal and parties may speak for themselves or through representation. Since hearings deal with specific issues that the applicant raised in his or her application, the Arbitrator will not consider issues that are not contained in the application.

The dispute resolution policy guidelines are also available online. These are useful for preparing for a hearing, but they are NOT binding on Arbitrators. Most RTB hearings are now conducted via telephone. However, there are still some face-to-face hearings.

a) Telephone Hearings

Parties should use a landline telephone in a quiet place where they will not be interrupted and avoid dropping the call on their cell phone. Parties should not try to call more than 5 minutes before the start of the hearing, as they will most likely not get through. The same is true if a party tries to call in more than 5 minutes after a hearing has started. The hearing will proceed even if one party gets disconnected during the call. It is important that parties check they have the correct telephone code. If a hearing has been adjourned or continued from an earlier hearing, the code will be different than the previous one.

Telephone hearings are scheduled for one hour exactly. If the hearing is not finished at this time, the Arbitrator may extend the hearing or schedule another conference call to continue the hearing. This may be several weeks or months after the first hearing. It is important that parties be focused on the outcome they wish to achieve and that their documents are carefully numbered so that time is not wasted searching for documents and other evidence.

b) Face-to-Face Hearings

All evidence should be submitted prior to the hearing, since adjournments will not be granted without good cause. Evidence can be in the form of:

  • a) any witnesses who provide relevant information;
  • b) all documents including letters, receipts, photographs; and
  • c) affidavits (sworn statements in writing).

c) Evidence

If possible, it is best to include all evidence with the initial application. However, if this is not possible, the RTB must receive a copy of all of the applicant’ s evidence no less than 14 days prior to the hearing; the respondent’s evidence must be received no less than 7 days prior to the hearing. Evidence can be faxed to the RTB at 1-866-341-1269. Rule 3.14 is particularly important here. It states that copies of any documents not filed with the application, but which the applicant wishes to present as evidence at the hearing, should be filed with the RTB and served on the respondent as soon as possible, and not less than 14 days prior to the hearing. This includes documents, photos, videos, audio tapes, and the like. To rely on digital evidence (photos, videos or audio), per rule 3.10, a party must first check whether the other party and the RTB are able to access the digital evidence. Digital evidence must be provided to the RTB on USB memory stick, CD or DVD for their permanent files and must also be accompanied by a printed description. Each party must also deliver a copy of all evidence to the RTB and the other party in accordance with Rule 3.14 as above. The Arbitrator will usually refuse to look at anything not exchanged in advance of the hearing pursuant to Rule 3.17, which says that if the documents or other evidence are not served on the other party as required:

  • a) the party must show that the evidence is relevant and that it was not available at the time they filed or when they served their other evidence;
  • b) the Arbitrator has discretion to determine whether to accept the evidence if it does not unreasonably prejudice the other party, and both parties must have the opportunity to be heard as to whether the evidence ought to be accepted;
  • c) if the evidence is accepted, the other party will have an opportunity to review it, therefore the Arbitrator must rule whether to adjourn, in accordance with Rule 6.3 and 6.4 which establish the criteria for adjourning a hearing.

The practical result of these rules is that Arbitrators will often refuse to look at any evidence that was not exchanged before the hearing as required.

The RTB’s definition of “days” is as follows, taken from the Dispute Resolution Rules of Procedure, located on the RTB’s website at http://www.rto.gov.bc.ca/documents/RoP.pdf

  • a) If the time for doing an act falls or expires on a holiday, the time is extended to the next day that is not a holiday
  • b) If the time for doing an act in a business office falls or expires on a day when the office is not open during regular business hours, the time is extended to the next day that the office is open
  • c) In the calculation of time expressed as clear days, weeks, months or years, or as "at least" or "not less than" a number of days, weeks, months or years, the first and last days must be excluded
  • d) In the calculation of time not referred to in subsection (c), the first day must be excluded and the last day included

Evidence should be clearly marked and numbered so that all parties involved in a telephone conference can easily locate the relevant documents when necessary.

For a face-to-face hearing, it is still a good idea to bring extra copies of important documents to the hearing itself, in case the Arbitrator, or the other party, does not have copies handy. Original photos and documents that are presented to the Arbitrator cannot be returned later to the party, but they can be subpoenaed into the Supreme Court for judicial review. Copies of documents can be given to the Arbitrator, but they may demand the originals. If a witness cannot attend, the Arbitrator may accept affidavits (however, written statements may suffice) and may take testimony over the phone. If a party thinks a witness has something to contribute to his or her case but the witness refuses to cooperate, the party can then request in advance or at the hearing that the Arbitrator subpoena that witness.

The Arbitrator may then decide to adjourn the hearing and subpoena the witness for the hearing when it reconvenes. The party requesting the subpoena is required to serve it on the person being subpoenaed. The Arbitrator also has the power to compel witnesses to give evidence under oath and/or to produce records that may be of importance to the hearing. Where a witness fails to comply with these procedures, he or she may be subject to a finding of contempt on application to the Supreme Court by the Arbitrator (RTA, s 76(3)).

The applicant should always bring proof of service (i.e. proof that the other side received the Notice of Hearing package) to the hearing or, for a telephone hearing, include it in the evidence the applicant submits to the RTB. The proof of service will have to be presented if the respondent does not attend – to prove that the applicant served the Notice of Hearing on the respondent. The person who served the documents should be at the hearing or should have provided an affidavit of service to the applicant.

4. The Arbitrator’s Decisions

The Arbitrator may render a decision at the end of the hearing and will make a written decision following the hearing. Pursuant to s 77(1), the written decision and reasons must be provided within 30 days. If a party completes a form requesting correction of a technical error, omission, or clarification within 15 days of the decision being given, such amended decision or clarification must be provided within 30 days.

The Arbitrator’s order is final and binding but may be reviewed in limited circumstances (s 79). See Section X.E: Review of Arbitrator’s Decision for details.

5. Amendments to Decisions/Orders

On an Arbitrator’ s initiative, or at the request of a party, the Arbitrator may correct technical errors, or within 15 days, clarify a decision, reason, or inadvertent omissions in a decision or order the Arbitrator may also require that notice of a request be given to the other party. The Arbitrator shall not exercise this power unless the Arbitrator considers it just and reasonable in the circumstances (RTA, s 78(3)). The forms to be completed are theRequest for Correction or a Request for Clarification.

The RTB continues to amend its Policy Guidelines on key issues under the RTA. There are now over 30 detailed RTB Policy Guidelines available that ensure more consistency in dispute resolution decisions, and which should be reviewed in preparation for any hearing. However, Arbitrators will not be required to consult the Guidelines.

C. Enforcing the Arbitrators Order

NOTE: If a successful party has any concerns about the ability to serve an order, he or she should request an order under RTA, s 71(1) permitting alternate means of service. An example of such an order would be one that permits serving a document at a tenant’ s workplace rather than at their new home.

1. Enforcing a Monetary Order

The Arbitrator may order the tenant or landlord to pay a monetary amount or to bear all or part of the costs of dispute resolution (RTA, s 67). Enforcement of the order is the sole responsibility of the applicant. If the monetary order is in favour of a tenant still living in the rental unit owned by the landlord that the order is against, the Arbitrator may direct the tenant to deduct the award from the rent (RTA, s 65(1)(b)). Rent should not be withheld unless the decision explicitly states this is allowed. If the monetary order is in favour of a landlord still holding part or all of the security deposit paid by the tenant, it may be deducted from the tenant’ s security deposit. If neither of these situations applies, one should give the other party a written request for payment stating the amount owing and requesting payment by the date on the order or within a reasonable time.

If the other party still does not pay, the order can be filed in the Small Claims Court.

2. Enforcing a Repair Order

If a landlord fails to make repairs as ordered by an Arbitrator, the tenant can apply for an order requiring compliance. The order to comply may include an order that the landlord reduces the rent until the repairs are complete.

3. Enforcing an Order of Possession

The purpose of an Order of Possession is to gain vacant possession of the rental premises. The landlord should first give a copy of the Order of Possession to each person named in the order. The best way to do this is to hand the copy to the other parties personally or by registered mail. The RTA also permits for the Order of Possession to be posted on the tenant’s door. The tenant should be asked to move out of the rental unit within the time period given in the order. If a tenant does not comply with the order, the landlord must notattempt to physically remove the tenant by his or her own means (RTA, s 57(1)(2)), as this is unlawful. Bailiff services, described below, can be used to lawfully remove the tenant.

a) Use of Bailiff Services

In the event that the tenant does not comply with the order and does not vacate the rental unit on the date specified on the order, the Order of Possession can be filed in the Supreme Court of B.C. Registry. The landlord must fill out a Writ of Possession and an Affidavit (re: service) and take these completed forms with the Order of Possession to the Supreme Court. Once the documents are filed and stamped in the Supreme Court, the landlord may contact a court bailiff service. The Writ of Possession is then ready to be executed by the court bailiff.

Under s 9 of the Sheriff Act, RSBC 1996, c. 425, the landlord is required to give a deposit to the court bailiff against the costs of the execution of the writ. This deposit varies depending on the size of the rental unit. For example, $1,100 for a one-bedroom and $3,000 for a five-bedroom house will be required as a deposit for executing a seizure.